Who built ancient cities on artificial islands in the middle of the Pacific Ocean? The unusual city of Olyantaytambo Who built the city

Nan Madol is an artificial archipelago with a total area of 79 hectares, consisting of 92 islands connected by a system of artificial canals. Also known as "Venice of the Pacific". Located near Temven Island, southeast of Ponape Island, part of the Caroline Islands, and until AD 1500. NS. was the capital of the So Dehler dynasty, which was ruling at that time.

Scientists have discovered a new prehistoric city in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Satellite imagery show giant square blocks located off the coast of Pohnpei. These square stone structures are surprisingly identical and geometric in shape.

Many people know about Nan Madol, but very little is known about the ruins that were discovered there recently on Pohnpei Island. Pohnpei, a small (345 square kilometers) volcanic island in the center of the Pacific Ocean, in Micronesia: far from here to continental Asia, and to the island Southeast Asia, even further to Australia and America.

The remote island of Pohnpei is located within the Micronesian island chain. Not far away is Nan Madol - a small archipelago southeast of Pohnpei Island in the Pacific Ocean, consisting of more than a hundred artificial islets of basalt monoliths and coral blocks connected by a system of canals and it is an archaeological site.

On the island of Ponape, lost in the Pacific Ocean, civilization developed and died long before the first European appeared there. In the era of the great geographical discoveries Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch and English sailors, returning from long voyages, told many incredible stories about the wonders of the Pacific islands.

Scientists, as a rule, considered these stories to be ordinary sailor tales and therefore did not believe the story of the Spanish captain Alvaro Saavedra, who in 1529 told about amazing island Ponape, lying between the Hawaiian archipelago and the Philippines. The captain claimed: the island has ruins of temples, palaces, incomprehensible large structures, stone embankments. According to him, the abandoned city vaguely resembled Venice.

For a long time geographers considered the mysterious city on Ponapa a legend, until the island was visited by the Russian navigator Fyodor Petrovich Litke during his circumnavigation of the world in 1826-1829 on the Senyavin sloop. He first drew up maps of the island, described the mysterious ruins of Ponape and mapped neighboring islands.

Ponape is a volcanic island with a diameter of only 15 kilometers, surrounded by a barrier reef. It is part of the Carolina Archipelago of Micronesia near the equator. The shores of the island are badly destroyed by tropical typhoons, and in the center of it there are dense thickets. In the east of the island there is an artificial lagoon, and here the reef barrier has been destroyed by human hands. There are ruins inside the shallow lagoon ancient city Nan Madol, located on more than a hundred small islets.

Examining the ruins, Litke was convinced that the inhabitants had left the city long ago, and only on the opposite side of the island, in primitive conditions, lived a handful of natives. Unfortunately, all the information about Ponap collected by Litke was lost in the archives of the Russian Geographical Society and was never fully published. In 1857, the ruins of Nan Madol were superficially surveyed by the American L. Gyulik, and a little later the Pole I. Kubari, who settled on the island, drew up the first detailed plan of the ruins.

In 1896, the Englishman F. Christian appeared on Ponapa, an unceremonious and dishonest explorer. Guided by Kubari's plan, he subjected the ruins of Nan Madol to a real robbery and himself almost died at the hands local residents after plundering several ancient tombs revered by the natives.

The most serious archaeological study of Nan Madol was undertaken in the late 19th - early 20th centuries by the German scientist Paul Hambruch, who established that all the islets inside the lagoon are of artificial origin!

Unknown builders brought basalt slabs from the north of the island, laid them in rows along and across, and if the blocks were of irregular shape, the gaps between them were filled with coral rubble. The tops of most of the platforms were flat, suitable for building structures.

During strong tides, the space between the platforms was flooded, and the town was covered with a network of canals, reminiscent of little Venice. Hambruch mapped ninety of these artificial islands... He also discovered artificial reservoirs, foundations of palaces and temple buildings.

In 1908, a book by Hambrukh was published, dedicated to the research of Nan Madol. In it, the scientist put forward the assumption that a religious and cult center of the Micronesians operated on Ponap for several centuries, where residents of other islands in Oceania made pilgrimages.

This was evidenced by the legends recorded by Hambrukh from the words of the aborigines. According to these legends, the island was once ruled by the prince Sau Deleur, whose name gradually became a title and meant the king-priest. There were fifteen such Sau Deleurs, and then the dynasty faded away. It is to this dynasty that the merit of the construction of stone buildings on artificial islands belongs.

The scientist determined the beginning of the construction of the sacred city around the 5th century AD. In 1958, this was confirmed by an examination conducted by researchers from the United States. A German archaeologist recorded the legend of the islanders about the main goddess of Nan Madol, the Nanunsunsan tortoise. A palace with a swimming pool was built for her, and the goddess herself was decorated with mother-of-pearl. On holidays, the priests took her by boat along the canals and shouted divinations on her behalf. Then the goddess was fried and solemnly eaten. In 1958, the Americans found thousands of shells of such goddesses at the bottom of a swampy reservoir inside the temple.

By 1914, Hambrukh and other researchers had established that there were about eight hundred stone structures in Nan Madol, including fortress walls and port buildings. The main temple was erected from megalithic blocks. Under this temple, a network of tunnels and canals was discovered through which people and boats could penetrate.

Archaeological discoveries on Ponapa have given rise to many fantastic and incredible hypotheses. Some scientists claimed: the remains of the legendary Lemuria were found on the island; others saw in the Cyclopean stone buildings the fruits of the activities of the Inca colonizers, who supposedly arrived on the island from Peru. It was also hypothesized that Ponape was an outpost of the Egyptian pharaohs in the Pacific Ocean.

American archaeologists were able to begin serious studies of Nan Madol only in 1958. From the stories of the natives, they learned that during the occupation, the Japanese were excavating in many parts of the island, finding something and taking it away. They talked about some kind of metal objects, sculptures and sarcophagi. The Americans sent an official request to Tokyo, but the Japanese authorities replied that they did not know anything about it.

Geological studies of the environs of St. Petersburg have revealed Interesting Facts... It turns out that a few thousand years ago, the sea was splashing in this area. This contradicts the opinion of some researchers of ancient history, who argue that an unknown megalithic civilization could have existed on the territory of St. Petersburg in the past. Sergei Sall, PhD in Physics and Mathematics, claims that, despite all these facts, traces of ancient culture have nevertheless been preserved in the form of huge stone blocks weighing about a thousand tons and seids located not far from St. Petersburg. Historians cannot answer who created these artifacts.

Petersburg is a city that was dug up, not built

About one question regularly comes up - about the attitude to those multiple publications on the network, in which the question of cities that have been dug out rather than built is more and more disclosed, about some noticeable cataclysm in the relatively recent past.

About St. Petersburg, in the context of these issues.

After walking a little through St. Petersburg, let us talk about the version that seems the most probable.

Traces of Ancient Civilization in St. Petersburg

Researchers of the secrets of antiquity have repeatedly drawn attention to the many oddities of the architecture and symbolism of the northern capital of Russia. Oddly enough, one of the youngest cities in our country leads in the number of objects, whose origin raises many questions. Historian writer and traveler Georgy Sidorov commented on the most striking of them. This is the symbol of St. Petersburg, the Alexander Column (also known as the "Alexandrian Pillar"), the Atlanteans of the Hermitage and St. Isaac's Cathedral. “As always, Georgy Alekseevich put forward his own sensational assumptions. Stay in St. Petersburg became the starting point for a long expedition across the waters of the Arctic Ocean.

St. Petersburg has always had a mystical reputation. This city attracts seekers of secrets of various directions. Riddles in St. Petersburg are found literally at every step: there are houses with bad fame, and an extensive network of dungeons, and a sign of the unfortunate Emperor Paul I, and even its own Bermuda triangle, not to mention countless Masonic symbols on the architectural structures of the northern capital. For a researcher of artifacts of ancient civilizations, Petersburg is a real treasure chest, but the writer-historian Georgy Sidorov, remaining true to himself, went the path that had not yet been passed and presented it radically A New Look to the secrets of Petersburg.

The first object of Georgy Sidorov's visit was the famous Alexander Column. This gigantic monument, almost fifty meters high and weighing more than 600 tons, was erected about two centuries ago in 1834. According to official data, the blanks for the column and pedestal were mined in the Pyuterlak quarry, then transported by water to St. Petersburg, where, under the guidance of the architect Auguste Montferrand, further processing of stone monoliths was carried out. However, the point of view of Georgy Sidorov on the origin of this monument differs significantly from the generally accepted one.

Georgy Sidorov: If you look at it, it is surprising that it is chiseled. To carve such a column out of a solid block of granite, firstly, at least, our civilization is needed, we need electricity, we need electric energy, we need special machines. We need a machine that could hone such a huge block. Well, for example, the column itself, 750 tons, can hardly be rotated, even in our time, now we do not have such technology. Most likely, this huge block stood, fixed, and some kind of mechanism moved along it, segment by segment, sharpening it to its full length and making it tapered. The fact is that, if you look at it, you can see, here is one segment, the second segment, it is all cut into segments, the sharpening went like this. Now the question is - how could this be done? After all, this was done by the mechanism, because the glare of light falls, there is not a single wave, it is made as if it were a ruler. It was made, preserved somewhere, most likely, they found it and decided to adapt it for this purpose, to perpetuate the power of the Russian Empire. Montferrand brilliantly managed to deliver it, establish it, but the fact that it was made in another civilization, not in our civilization, it was made a very long time ago, maybe 12-15 thousand years ago, because even now, as far as I am managed to ask architects and builders, those who know stone, work on stone, they shrug their shoulders. Currently, there is no technology for manufacturing such a column. They just never existed. You can put it, you can bring it, but it's almost impossible to do it. Here a lot of questions arise. On the one hand, why did you need Hittite eagles, not Russian, but Hittite eagles, they are not Byzantine, Byzantine eagles, they are already with crowns, here is a pure Hittite two-headed eagle, on four sides, and it is not clear where it came from here.

Just like that! The column glorifying the victory of Russia over Napoleon, in fact, contains symbols of completely different peoples and completely different times, which may indicate its ancient origin. By the way, you can read about some of the little-known details of the death of the Hittite Empire and the appearance of the two-headed eagle in Russia in the books of Georgy Sidorov.

Passing the building of the new Hermitage, Georgy Sidorov drew attention to the magnificent figures of the Atlanteans, holding a massive balcony on their shoulders. The keen eye of the researcher was attracted not so much by the artistic merit of these majestic sculptures as by the way they were made.

Georgy Sidorov: They are all one to one, all one. For interest, look, all this is one. Do you understand? Bodies, bodies, the impression is that they are simply molded from the same mold, everything is made.

Female: Hair too, they are slightly different.

Georgy Sidorov: What is left for the sculptor to finish? Here, loincloths, hair, that's what sets them apart. Toes, legs, proportions - everything about the body itself, it's all one to one, down to maybe one tenth of a millimeter. That is, it is practically one figure, it is one figure everywhere. So, it turns out that those who once made them, they owned the secret of liquid granite, managed to make granite liquid, poured it, then some parts that caught the eye, they changed, here are the loincloths, they changed their hair, that is, there the sculptor's cutter was already working. And it turns out that they seem to be the same, at the same time slightly different, but the proportions are absolute. The structure of the knees, the structure of the legs, the structure of the veins, the veins are all the same absolutely on the legs, as it were, here they are from the same shape. They are all one form. Here's how to explain it? Only in one case can it be explained that the Atlanteans were cast, they were not made of solid granite, granite slabs or stones, they were cast from the same mold, and then they were finished, the difference was made only here where the work went on the wool, that is wool, loincloths, hair on the head, everything, everything else is the same.

The last point outlined by Georgy Sidorov to visit was St. Isaac's Cathedral. This majestic architectural structure was erected in the middle of the 19th century by the design of the same Auguste Montferrand, the author of the Alexander Column. Is it possible that they have a common ancient origin?

Georgy Sidorov: This part here, the large steps are an exact copy of the May pyramids, the Aztec pyramids, they are circular, this is a piece of the pyramid. He goes there, I don't know, the depth, maybe there is a depth of 20 meters, maybe more. And this is the temple. Here, too, these steps, they are already modern, they are made for the modern, that is, it was done recently. And those steps, too, but they are made for people not of our race, two, two twenty, two thirty, two fifty, approximately, height. The construction has been done, and these steps have been made for other people, this is done for giants, for a very large four-meter man, and this was then adapted for us.

You can see that this is the same technology as the Alexandrian pillar, that these columns, the only difference is that they are lighter, much lighter than the pillar. Each column weighs approximately 110 tons. This is also a huge weight, and it is not clear how these columns were delivered, it is not clear how they were installed, because you can describe everything, as we say, “paper will endure everything,” but, in fact, in those times when there was no electricity, it was all done. They were carved, then they were polished, but now, if you look closely at the steps and columns, you can see that, both along the steps and along the columns, such ripples have gone through the polishing, that is, the process of weathering is underway. And the weathering over a century, for two such levels cannot be, it is clear that these columns and steps are gigantic, they were not made in the 18th century, not in the 17th or even in the 15th, that is, it was a very long time ago. All this is a single complex.

The tour of St. Petersburg has come to an end. In the port of Georgy Sidorov, the boat "Mercury" is waiting for him, on which he, together with his colleagues, will sail along the coast of the Arctic Ocean. The purpose of the expedition is to search for traces ancient civilization Hyperborea that existed on the disappeared mainland Arctida. We will tell you about what Georgy Sidorov will discover during the expedition on the channel "Property of the Planet"

Artifacts about ancient Russia are hidden in the Hermitage

Why isn't an ancient Slavic exposition on display in the Hermitage? Nothing? The director of the Hermitage answers - yes!

"Emperor Peter I and St. Isaac's Cathedral", St. Petersburg, painting by artist Maxim Vorobyov, 1844

The first person who read this article asked me a question: "What is the practical meaning of this work?" As an answer to this question, I will quote the words of Pyotr Stolypin (1862-1911), who was killed in Kiev and who held the post of chairman of the Council of Ministers in the last years of his life. Russian Empire... He said this:

"The people who do not know their history are dung on which other peoples grow."

So in order for us to stop being dung for someone, we need to finally get to know our true history and to reveal one secret, carefully hidden from century to century, associated with Peter I and the city on the Neva - St. Petersburg.

I will say right away that the first Russian emperor Peter I (1672-1725) did not just appear on the historical stage as reformer of Russia and it is no coincidence that even during his lifetime, many in Russia talked about replacing one Peter (the son of the second Russian tsar from the Romanov family) with another Peter, a foreigner, from an unknown family.

By the way, the disputes about the tribal origin of the "other" Peter I, who went down in the history of Russia as great reformer and the builder of the city of St. Petersburg, do not subside until now, because it is really unclear whose blood flowed in his veins. Judging by his lifetime portraits and portraits of his family, Russian by blood, Peter I was not unambiguous!

Portraits of the first Russian emperor Peter I, his second wife Catherine I and daughters Elizabeth and Anna:

These portraits were painted by various artists and in different time, while the persons depicted in these portraits have the same "national" characteristics! There are no Russians, Slavs, with such faces as we see in these portraits! Whose blood were Peter I, his second wife Catherine the First and their daughters?- this question remains open to this day.

As for the stormy reformatory activities of Peter I, today we know only one thing thoroughly: Peter I was literally replaced by another person or his "as if changed"(delve into the meanings of the words of the Russian language!) after his stay abroad in the period from March 1697 to August 1698.

Contemporaries noted, who saw and knew Peter I before, that he had changed very much outwardly, but even more, beyond recognition, he had changed internally.

Even before returning to Moscow from a trip abroad, directly from London, the 26-year-old Tsar of All Russia gave a written order to imprison his lawful wife Evdokia Lopukhina, Russian by origin, in the Suzdal Intercession Monastery, whom he married at the age of 16.

There is interesting information regarding the first wife of Peter I: "Evdokia Lopukhina went down in history as last Russian wife Russian tsar. And all subsequent Russian emperors also took only foreign women as their wives, why in the veins of their heirs it became less and less Russian blood" . .

A very curious touch in the history of the Russian state, isn't it?

Now let's move on to considering the most interesting cases of Peter and the history of St. Petersburg.

It is known that on July 31, 1698, while staying in Rava (Russian), Peter I met with the King of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth August II. "Communication between the two monarchs, who were almost the same age, continued for three days... As a result, a personal friendship arose and creation of an alliance against Sweden... Finally secret treaty with the Saxon elector and the Polish king was concluded on November 1, 1699. According to him, August II was supposed to start a war against Sweden by invading Livonia "... (Encyclopedic article "The Great Embassy".).

Reference: for the first time in the documents Rava-Russkaya was mentioned in the 15th century. Prince Vladislav of Belz and Mazovia in 1455 named a small locality on the Rata River, with the addition of the word "Russian" to distinguish it from Rava Mazowiecka, now located in Poland. ...

In other words, during that meeting with Augustus II, Peter I concluded a secret agreement with him, according to which, upon the return of the tsar of all Russia to Moscow, they would jointly start a war against Sweden in order to achieve some of their interests in this war.

And shortly before that, on July 14, 1698, the 26-year-old Peter I met with the 58-year-old Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation (also the ruler of Austria) Leopold I (from the Habsburg clan). We can only guess about the details of that meeting, but the political steps taken by the young Tsar of All Russia upon his return to Moscow are interesting.

On the collage: Leopold I & Peter I (in their youth they looked like brothers) and the coat of arms of the Holy Roman Empire, which later became the coat of arms of the Russian Empire too.

So, returning to Moscow from the foreign embassy, Peter I considered it important for himself to immediately strike a crushing blow on everything Russian, especially Russian history and tradition.

Why and why?

Well, Peter I did not like Russians, that is why he wanted to turn Russia into a semblance of a European state, and most of all - into a semblance of the Holy Roman Empire. In addition, during a foreign tour in Europe, 26-year-old Peter I was explained (most likely Leopold I did it) that he has every chance of turning from “Tsar of All Russia” into “Emperor of the Russian Empire” if he takes a number of correct steps.

Presumably, Peter I was explained this.

By the time on the shore Gulf of Finland, on the territory controlled by the 18-year-old Swedish King Karl XII, there was already a small antique city with stone buildings, the very existence of which did not give rest to the powers that be.

For world history, this ancient city, first absorbed by water, and then liberated, was the same artifact that could not be hidden anywhere, like the ancient Egyptian pyramids. Most of all, the "mighty of this world" were worried that he was standing on the primordially Russian land! It was an ancient city built by the Russians! And by its existence, he proved the centuries-old, and maybe many-thousand-year Russian history!

These two-century-old drawings show part of the territory Vasilievsky Island adjacent to the Bolshaya Neva embankment (Lieutenant Schmidt embankment) between the 25th and 19th lines. Apparently, the draftsman documented not Peter's new buildings, but the remains of an ancient stone city, where, along with the collapsed buildings, there were also relatively intact ones.

This engraving by Alexei Fedorovich Zubov (1682 - 1751), the artist of Peter the Great, depicts the entry of Swedish ships into the Neva on September 9, 1714 after the victory at Gangut. The inscription on the engraving "Vasilievsky Island at St. Petersburg." The artist painted the stone embankment and numerous multi-storey buildings in detail on the engraving. At the same time, the official history claims that only 11 years ago there was nothing on this place! All this, they say, was built by Peter I, who had only 40,000 troops for the war with Sweden ...

And this century-old photograph captures the building of the Hermitage, the first floor of which, despite the fact that this building, as historians assure, is quite recent, turned out to be deep underground!

Hermitage building.

These "powerful of this world", who are interested in ensuring that all such artifacts never speak, were visited by the 26-year-old Russian Tsar Peter I. on his foreign tour.

"An interesting fact is the composition of the Russian embassy that went to Europe. The number of those accompanying the tsar was 20 people, while the embassy was headed by Alexander Menshikov. And the returned embassy consisted, with the exception of Menshikov, only of Dutch citizens! two weeks, as expected, but returned only after more than a year ...

The archers - the guards and elite of the Russian tsarist army - suspected something was wrong. The outbreak of the streltsy revolt was brutally suppressed by Peter. But the archers were the most advanced and combat-ready military units that faithfully served the Russian tsars. Sagittarius became hereditary, which indicates the highest level of these units.

It is characteristic that the scale of the destruction of the archers was more global than according to official sources. At that time, the number of archers reached 20 thousand people, and after the suppression of the rifle revolt by the government of Peter I, the Russian army was left without infantry, after which a new set of recruits was made and the army was completely reorganized. A notable fact is that in honor of the suppression of the rifle riot, a commemorative medal was issued with inscriptions on Latin, which had never been used before in the minting of coins and medals in Russia, but was used in the Holy Roman Empire. "

On the left is the medal of Peter I "Suppression of the Streltsy Riot, 1698", on the right, for comparison, the medal of Leopold I.

By the way, another interesting detail about the story of the archers' rebellion.

"In March 1698, 175 archers from 4 rifle regiments who participated in the Azov campaigns of Peter I in 1695-1696, summoned by Princess Sofia Alekseevna (sister of Peter I and daughter of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich), appeared in Moscow. Peter I is not her brother...

On June 6, the archers displaced their commanders, elected 4 electives in each regiment and headed towards Moscow. The insurgents (2,200 people) intended to elevate Princess Sophia to the throne or, in case of her refusal, V.V. Golitsyn, who was in exile.

The government sent the Preobrazhensky, Semyonovsky, Lefortovo and Butyrsky regiments (about 4,000 people) and the noble cavalry under the command of A.S. Shein, General P. Gordon and Lieutenant General Prince I.M.Koltsov-Mosalsky against the archers.

In the battle at the Resurrection Monastery on the part of the Government, the following took part:

Butyrsky regiment - general P. Gordon

"Battalion" of the Preobrazhensky Regiment - Major Nikolai von Salm

"Battalion" (6 companies) of the Semyonovsky regiment - half-colonel I. I. Angler

Lefortovo regiment - colonel Yu S. Lim

Artillery under the command of the colonel de Grague (Grange)" . .

As you can see, the names of the commanders of the government troops are clearly not Russian.

It turns out that a non-Russian head was put on the body of the state-forming Russian people in the form of Peter I and foreigners loyal to him ...

After the suppression of the Streltsy revolt, Peter I considered it important to reform the Russian calendar, which resulted in the fact that the Slavs had 5508 years of their history circumcised and the next 7208 summer became the year 1700.

Peter I also replaced the Slavic word "new year" with the "New Year" invented by him ("Happy New Year!"), And the ancient Russian holiday "Christmas of the Sun", celebrated for centuries in Russia on December 25, 3 days after winter solstice , he replaced the holiday "Christmas of Christ".

If you think about the words "Happy New Year!", Then these words of congratulation (and the spelling of the word "Year" with a capital letter) is nothing more than the blasphemous congratulation "HAPPY NEW GOD!" In German, God is Gott, in English God is God, as well as in a number of other languages. So it turns out that in the now widely known expression "Happy New Year!" the blasphemous meaning was initially embedded - "With a New God!" (instead of the old god, Slavic - Yarila!). That is why this word "Year" was written with a capital letter!

The logic of such a mockery of the consciousness of a Russian person is also curious. A primordial winter Russian holiday "Christmas of the Sun"(born of Virgin-Heaven and Holy Spirit according to ancient Slavic mythology), celebrated in Russia from time immemorial on December 25, was replaced by "The Nativity of Christ"(born of Jewish virgin mary and "holy spirit" in the form of a dove, according to Jewish legend).

The reformer or reformers (perhaps Peter I took this step not alone, but with the "patriarch of all Russia"), were guided by the following considerations: "Let's assume that the legendary Christ was also born on December 25, just on the day when the Slavs celebrate the holiday "Christmas of the Sun", but that day he was not yet circumcised according to the Jewish tradition as befits a Jew! For Jews, circumcision is done on the 8th day from birth. Therefore, to December 25 you need to add another 7 days, and then birthday God-man Christ it turns out exactly - January 1st!" .

8 days: December - 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, January - 1. The Jews think so. December 25 is considered the first day, January 1 - the 8th day.

And after the Petrine reform it became like this:

And so it was (certificate of 1865):

Almost simultaneously with these steps, Peter I, returning from the "Great Embassy", began to prepare for a war with Sweden. It was also necessary to fight for the exit of Russia to Baltic Sea, and for the future title of Emperor of the Russian Empire, which Peter I acquired in 1721 after the end of the 21-year "Northern War" with Sweden, which began in 1700.

Historical reference: “In 1699, the“ Northern Alliance ”was created against the Swedish king Charles XII, which, in addition to Russia, included Denmark, Saxony and the Commonwealth, headed by the Saxon Elector and the Polish king August II. The driving force of the union was the desire of August II to take Livland from Sweden. For help, he promised Russia the return of land, formerly Russian(Ingermanland, which was located within the borders of today's Leningrad region, and Karelia) ". .

The latter is an important fact!

In other words, during a long trip abroad, Peter I had an idea (a friend threw in, but which one, August II or Leopold I?) belonged to the Russians.

Modern geographic map showing the border of Russia:

And when this historically Russian land was conquered by Peter I from the Swedish king Charles XII, he laid in 1703 on the shores of the Gulf of Finland, allegedly from scratch, a new city of St. Petersburg.

This is how many historians tell about it, including Wikipedia:

"For Russia to enter the war, it was necessary to conclude peace with Ottoman Empire... After reaching an armistice with the Turkish Sultan for a period of 30 years, Russia on August 19 (30), 1700 declared war on Sweden under the pretext of revenge for the insult shown to Tsar Peter I in Riga ...

Considering that Russia was sufficiently weakened, Charles XII left with his troops to Livonia in order to direct all forces against August II.

However, Peter I, continuing the army reforms on the European model, resumed hostilities. Already in the fall of 1702, the Russian army, in the presence of the tsar, captured the Noteburg fortress (renamed Shlisselburg), in the spring of 1703 - the Nyenskans fortress at the mouth of the Neva. Here, on May 16 (27), 1703, the construction of St. Petersburg began, and on the island of Kotlin the base of the Russian fleet - the fortress of Kronshlot (later Kronshtadt) was located ". .

Now I propose to delve deeper into the description of the "Northern War" that Peter I waged against Sweden for as much as 21 years, and perhaps then the reader will understand that historians are simply fooling him with their words ...

Battle of Narva

"On August 18, 1700, Peter received news of the conclusion of the Constantinople Peace Treaty with the Turks and on August 19 (30), not yet knowing about Denmark's withdrawal from the war, he declared war on Sweden, and on August 24 (September 3) Russian troops launched an offensive campaign. According to the treaty of alliance with August II, Russia was to withdraw Ingermanlandia (otherwise "Swedish Ingria") - a territory roughly corresponding to the present Leningrad region. Big City and the largest Swedish fortress in the region, Narva, which became the main target of the Russian commanders.

The campaign to Narva was not organized well, in the fall: the soldiers were systematically malnourished, the horses carrying equipment were fed so poorly that by the end of the campaign they began to die, and in addition, due to the rains that began and the poor condition of the roads, the wagons regularly broke down at the convoy. Peter I planned to concentrate over 60 thousand soldiers near Narva, but the slow pace of the army's advance towards Narva frustrated the tsar's timelines and plans. In the end, the siege of Narva began only on October 14 (25) with forces, according to various estimates, from 34 thousand to 40 thousand soldiers.

The siege of Narva was also poorly organized. The shelling of the city from cannons was ineffective due to the fact that the Russian army used too light weapons, moreover, the ammunition was enough for only two weeks. Narva was actually a double fortress together with a neighboring Ivangorod , and Peter I, who personally planned the siege, was forced to greatly stretch the Russian troops, surrounding both fortresses at the same time. Such an unfortunate location of the Russian troops subsequently negatively affected their combat effectiveness during the subsequent battle of Narva.

Meanwhile, August II, having learned about the imminent withdrawal of Denmark from the war, lifted the siege of Riga and retreated to Courland, which allowed Charles XII to transfer part of his army by sea to Pernov (Pärnu). Having landed there on October 6, he headed towards Narva, besieged by Russian troops. Peter I, together with Field Marshal Count Golovin, left the army on the night of November 18 and went to Novgorod. The highest command of the army was entrusted by the tsar, the senior in the rank - a foreigner, the Duke de Croix.

On November 19 (30), 1700, the army of Charles XII, numbering 25 thousand people, inflicted a heavy defeat on the Russian army, according to various estimates, from 34 to 40 thousand people in the battle of Narva. The Duke de Croix, with his headquarters, also consisting of foreigners, surrendered to Charles XII even before the decisive moment of the battle.

By November 21 (December 2), the main part of the Russian army, which, after all the losses, still outnumbered the Swedish, surrendered by order of the Duke de Croix. The Preobrazhensky Life Guards and Semyonovsky Life Guards regiments staunchly defended themselves against the Swedes, which not only managed to avoid the shameful surrender themselves, but also covered the withdrawal of a part of the Russian army, thereby saving it from complete defeat. For the courage shown in this battle, the soldiers of the regiment in 1700-1740. wore red stockings (in memory of the fact that "in this battle they stood knee-deep in blood").

Campaign results for Russian side were catastrophic: the losses in killed, mortally wounded, drowned, deserted and died from hunger and frost ranged from 8 thousand to 10 thousand people, 700 people, including 10 generals and 56 officers, were captured, 179 of 184 guns were lost.

Among the reasons for the defeat of the Russian army are the following: poor preparedness for war (the Russian army was in the stage of reorganization) with a strong enemy; the troops did not know how to fight according to the rules of linear tactics, conduct reconnaissance, were poorly armed; the artillery was outdated and multi-caliber (at that time there were more than 25 different calibers in artillery, which in many respects made it difficult to supply artillery with ammunition) and, most importantly, the Russian army did not have its own national command staff, all the main command posts were foreign officers.

After this defeat for several years in Europe, the opinion about the complete incapacity of the Russian army was established, and Charles XII received the nickname of the Swedish "Alexander the Great". After the defeat at Narva, Peter I limited the number of foreign officers in the army. They could be only 1/3 of the total number of officers in the unit.

The defeat at Narva played a huge role in the development of the Russian army and the history of the country. As the historian M.N. Pokrovsky pointed out, all Russia's interests in the war were reduced to trade, to conquering an outlet to the sea and gaining control over trade ports in the Baltic. Therefore, from the very beginning of the war, Peter took under special sight the Baltic ports of Narva and Riga, but having suffered a crushing defeat near Narva and being thrown back to the area of present St. Petersburg, he decided to build a new port and city at the mouth of the Neva - the future capital of the Russian Empire ". .

So, not being able to really fight, having at that time only 40 thousandth army, (and what is 40 thousand people for the king of all Russia?), Not even being able to recapture from the Swedes Ivangorod , founded in the spring of 1492 by the Moscow prince Ivan III Vasilyevich just so that Russia has its own sea port in the Baltic Sea, Peter I eagerly proceeds to build a new city from scratch and after 8 years declares it the capital of Russia!

Don't you think this is at least strange?

Do not you think that in this intention of Peter I it is imperative to build new capital Russia on the shores of the Gulf of Finland has a kind of "second bottom", "a certain secret", which the official history is silent about ...

The plan of the new city of St. Petersburg, drawn up in 1717 in Paris.

What's the secret?

Let's say that Peter I wanted Russia to have access to the Baltic Sea, and therefore he deposed the status of the capital from Moscow and entrusted this status to the newly built city.

Agree, somehow frivolous. Well, it would be just a port city, like Ivangorod, why did the capital have to be moved ?!

There is only one explanation for this phenomenon: the "powerful of this world", whom the Russian tsar visited during his foreign tour, or who (according to another version) replaced the son of Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov - Peter I - with their own man, inspired him that he could one day become a great emperor, like the mighty emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, but for this you need to do one little thing related to the "northern capital of Russia": everyone must believe that the "king of all Russia" built a new stone city with a complex architecture practically from scratch!

Panorama of the city, made up of photographs taken in 1861. Clickable !!!

Article: "Why was the outstanding Russian scientist Mikhailo Lomonosov sentenced to death?"

Well, Peter I, for his great zeal, received the title of "Emperor of All Russia" in 1721, as the engraving of the court artist Fyodor Zubov eloquently testifies to us:

Who was the "godfather" of Peter I, it is not difficult to guess, looking at this engraving, where the Roman commander lays the imperial crown on the head of Peter I. This "godfather" could only be the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire Leopold I, whose coat of arms was copied for Russia by "Peter the Great", changing only the attributes of power on the image of the Russian coat of arms:

The coat of arms of the Holy Roman Empire and its ruler Leopold I.

The opinion of an independent historian and just a very observant person, Andrei Kadykchansky:

"Peter. For me it is mysterious not so much by its appearance as by its inexplicable oblivion. It is quite obvious that it is the same antediluvian, antique city, like all those cities that Europe attributes to the achievements of their own ancestors. It is incomprehensible how it was possible to inspire the whole world, that the whole Mediterranean is antiquity, the cradle of world civilization, and Petersburg is only some three hundred years old?

Historians argue that Peter I thus introduced "wild, dark, uneducated, downtrodden" Russia to the achievements of the "great Western civilization." But we now know that the Russians did not always sigh with awe at the Snickers and Marlboros. This model of behavior was introduced into the mass consciousness during the years of Khrushchev's wrecking rule, aggravated during the times of Brezhnev's decomposition caused by a well-fed, carefree life, which took especially ugly caricatured forms under Gorbachev, and reached its peak during the shameful period of "reign", the eternally drunk EBN.

Therefore, we can say with confidence that the explanation is simple - like a faceted glass: it's all about the spirituality of the Russian people. In his naive faith in justice, and in his own modesty.

It never occurred to us that someone could muster up such impudence that they would ascribe to themselves such global achievements as antique architecture and sculpture. Because it is by nature absolutely unnatural for us ourselves. We readily believe in the brilliant achievements of Western civilization, whose representatives only grit their teeth because St. Petersburg is not on their territory.

Meanwhile, upon closer examination, everyone who believes their own eyes is convinced that the "ancient" Greece with Rome and the North-West of Russia are one civilization, one culture, and ... not ours.

Anton Blagin:

Now let's remember the "Masonic symbols" of St. Petersburg, which are very common in the architecture of buildings.

Do you see a triangle with rays emanating from it?

Do you think it really is "masonic symbol"?

Here is the same symbol on a shield attached to the chest of an angel installed on the roof of St. Isaac's Cathedral. In the triangle, from which the rays emanate in all directions, the "divine eye" is also clearly visible.

The most amazing thing in our history is that the Masonic lodge called "Freemasons" some had to create and officially register (so that everyone would know that there are such guys!) only because the city of St. Petersburg on the Neva with its amazingly rich architecture appeared on all maps of the world!

Historical reference: "The modern Order of Free Masons was organizationally formed at the beginning of the 18th century. On the day of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist June 24, 1717 in the London tavern "Goose and Spit" was established the world's first "Grand Lodge", uniting four "Small Lodges", gathered until that time in other city taverns. Thus, the Masonic organization of the new era was created, which laid the foundation for the institution of modern Freemasonry, which spread a couple of decades later throughout the European continent.

In 1723, The Book of Constitutions by James Anderson (1680 -1739) was published under the title "Constitutions of Freemasons, Containing the History, Duties and Rules of this Ancient and Most Respectable Brotherhood", which was approved and adopted as the basic law by the Freemasons. The Constitutions, among other things, contained the mythical history of Freemasonry from the Garden of Eden to 1717. The goal of the union of Freemasons was designated as striving for moral self-improvement, knowledge of the Truth and oneself, as well as love for one's neighbor.

The main version of the origin of Freemasonry is considered to be a version of the origin of medieval building partnerships. Freemasonry is now spread throughout the world and is represented in various organizational forms - lodges, grand lodges, supreme councils, chapters, Areopagus, consistories, federations and confederations. The total number of freemasons in the world is estimated at 4,000,000. ". .

Well, who else, besides these mysterious "free masons", could possess the amazing secrets of artistic stone processing and create such beauty ?! This question is, of course, sarcasm on my part.

Here is an example of the strikingly beautiful stone processing used during the construction of St. Petersburg:

The figures are stone, but the impression is that they are cast in the same mold! And they seem to be actually cast! This technology (or something like this) is used to make stone sinks for kitchens!

IMPORTANT VIDEO APP:

"Pre-Petrine Peter": https://youtu.be/zRUOgjxgmh0

Comments:

Anton Blagin: I will now cite two old drawings made by court artists, who were supposed to use painting (alas, there was no cinematograph yet!) to convince everyone who showed interest in the technique and technology of building the city of Peter that the granite columns of St. Isaac's Cathedral are of impeccably round diameter and careful grinding, made in the local quarry by bast shoes with the help of simple iron axes!

"Quarry Puterlax near Vyborg, property of landowner von Exparre".

Well, it is very convincingly drawn how everything was! Well, right for the undergrowth, who did not even hold a hammer in their hands! They say that the men knocked on the granite block with their axes and it, (lo and behold!), Became an impeccably even cylindrical shape! Even from the side that lay on the ground !!!

It is on such a lie, focused on people who do not know how to think, that our would-be historians are pierced! They would be silent - the people would simply be lost in conjectures! And now, after such a lie, that's it, pipes! It is already clear that the "Cathedral of Isa-Kievsky" was built in a completely different way and by the wrong people! And at a completely different time!

So who built St. Petersburg? And what do the Masons have to do with it, despite the fact that the city on the Neva is literally stuffed with mysterious symbols, which many consider Masonic?

Below I want to cite it in full, because it is just a continuation of this topic, just written a little earlier.

"RUSSIAN AXIS OF THE WORLD"

Do you know, reader, what is this red line running across the globe of the Earth?

Officially, this is the so-called "Pulkovo Meridian". Many fascinating stories have recently been written about him by various historians, filled, as a rule, with various speculations that do not reveal the truth, but even more hide it ...

"Pulkovo Meridian" (for short and literally) is a conditional line oriented strictly in the North-South direction and passing through the center of the hall of the main building of the Pulkovo Observatory, built on the outskirts of St. Petersburg in 1839.

And unofficially (and this information is not widely promoted), this red line on the world map shows how from north to south several millennia ago (or maybe several tens of millennia!) The most mysterious people on earth, whose representatives the ancient Greeks called Hyperboreans("who lived beyond Boreas"), and the Indians called aryami, aryami, which translates into Russian as "noble".

Peter I, apparently, introduced imitation of the once existing Hyperborean classification of those initiated into the secrets of fire, stone and spirit! They were called aryas - noble ones.

When in Russia and the world at the turn of the XIX and XX centuries there was a boom in the passion for the Aryan theme and Aryan symbols(the main Aryan symbol is the well-known sign of the swastika - a cross with curved ends, and the other symbol is an "eye in a triangle"), the French philosopher and writer Edouard Schure wrote the following lines in his book about the Aryans: “If the black race matured under the scorching sun of Africa, the flourishing of the white race took place under the icy breeze of the North Pole. Greek mythology calls white Hyperboreans... These red-haired, blue-eyed people came from the north through the woods illuminated northern lights, accompanied by dogs and deer, led by brave leaders, compelled by the gift of clairvoyance of their women. The gold of the hair and the blue of the eyes are predetermined colors. This race was assigned to create a solar cult of sacred fire and bring into the world a longing for the heavenly homeland.…» (E. Schure. "Great Initiates" , Printing house of the Provincial Zemsky Council, 1914).

Another writer, B.G. Tilak, who is of Indo-Aryan origin (he is from a Brahman family), at about the same time wrote and published the book "The Arctic Homeland in the Vedas". In the modern edition of the book by B. G. Tilak, in the annotation to it, literally the following is written: oldest monuments literature, Vedas and Avesta that the ancestral home of the Aryans existed in the arctic region, and the last glaciation drove out the Aryan races from the north to the lands of Europe. The Indian scientist saw in ancient texts an accurate reflection of not only historical, astronomical, but also geophysical realities associated with the Arctic. This discovery allowed Tilak to be decades ahead of the conclusions of archaeologists, philologists, physicists and astronomers and contribute to the general progress of knowledge about the original history of the human race and the history of the planet inhabited by this race. "().

From these points of view (official and unofficial) let us now look at the "Pulkovo Meridian", which until 1884 served Russian navigators and cartographers as the "Russian axis of the world." And, perhaps, we will be lucky to jointly find and comprehend the historical truth hidden from the common people.

So, what is the so-called "Pulkovo meridian"?

Encyclopedic reference: "Pulkovo meridian passing through the center of the main observatory building and located 30 ° 19.6 "east of Greenwich, was previously a reference point for all geographic maps Of Russia... All ships of Russia counted their longitude from the Pulkovo meridian until, in 1884, for the zero-point of longitude counting all over the globe the meridian passing through the axis of the transit instrument of the Greenwich Observatory (zero or Greenwich meridian) was not accepted. " .

In other words, today (and for 132 years now) the Pulkovo meridian is located at 30 ° 19.6 "east longitude. And earlier, for almost 50 years, the Pulkovo meridian was at zero degrees of geographic longitudes. and served for all Russian navigators and cartographers literally "the Russian axis of the world" until the initiative was seized by the "mistress of the seas" power-hungry England.

Now it's time to ask questions:

Was it by chance in 1827 that the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences (with the approval of Tsar Nicholas I) decided to create a new, Pulkovo observatory?

Was it by chance that the Pulkovo Observatory and the city of St. Petersburg itself were on the same line with such sacred cities like Kiev, Constantinople (now Istanbul) and Alexandria?

According to the same encyclopedia, "The appointed special commission stopped the selection on the top of the Pulkovo Mountain, indicated by Emperor Nicholas I and lying to the south of the capital, 14 versts from the Moscow outpost, at an altitude of 248 feet (75 meters) above sea level. To develop a detailed project of the new observatory in 1833 A committee of academicians Vishnevsky, Parrot, Struve and Fuss was formed, under the chairmanship of Admiral A.S. Greig, who had already erected an observatory in Nikolaev several years earlier. in Munich to Ertel, Reichenbach and Merz and Mahler, in Hamburg - to the Repsold brothers. The laying of the observatory took place on June 21 (July 3), 1835, and the solemn consecration of the completed buildings - August 7 (19), 1839. The total cost of the construction reached 2,100,500 rubles in banknotes , including 40,000 rubles in banknotes issued to state peasants who had their estates on the study alienated for the observatory a stack of 20 acres. Originally, an observatory building with three towers and 2 houses for astronomers was built ... " .

After these words, it is reasonable to be puzzled by two questions: "Why did the Russian Emperor Nicholas I indicate to Russian scientists the place, and not vice versa, did they show him the place where a new observatory should be built? And why did Nicholas I choose the place he indicated for the observatory, and not some other?"

The answer to both of these questions can be the following ancient map, compiled more than two thousand years ago by Hipparchus, on which the division of the Earth into West and East passed through the ancient Egyptian "akademgorodok" - Alexandria, which for a long time was famous for its richest scientific library .

Here is a map of the world compiled by Hipparchus in about 150 BC. The axis of the world on this map is the Alexandria meridian.

The Russian Emperor Nicholas I, being a highly educated and initiated person into some secrets, of course knew that St. Petersburg was located exactly on the line of the Alexandria meridian. In addition, he knew that the largest shrine of Egypt is located on this line - great pyramid Cheops.

And we, in turn, need to know and take into account that after 1812, memorable by the Patriotic War of Russia with Napoleon Bonaparte, who led a huge coalition army that invaded the territory of the Russian Empire, the Russian emperors developed a special love for Ancient Egypt and attachment. (I'll talk about this later).

It is precisely for these reasons that the Russian Emperor Nicholas I pointed out to Russian scientists where a new Russian observatory should be built. The Russian emperor decided thereby to fix for posterity direct historical connection between St. Petersburg, Alexandria and the ancient Egyptian pyramids.

And now, to clarify the above, I'll tell you a little about something that no one else has written about.

Let's ask ourselves a question: why did Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France, before attacking the Russian Empire in 1812, decided to make a difficult and very risky military campaign in Egypt?

The official point of view on these events is as follows: "The Egyptian campaign or the Egyptian expedition (fr. Expdition d'Egypte) is a campaign undertaken in 1798-1801 on the initiative and under the direct leadership of Napoleon Bonaparte, the main goal of which was an attempt to conquer Egypt.

The lull that came after the brilliant successes of the Italian campaign of 1796-1797 did not correspond to the political plans of General Bonaparte. After the first victories, Napoleon began to claim an independent role. He needed a series of victorious events that would boggle the imagination of the nation and make him the favorite hero of the army. He worked out a plan for an expedition to occupy Egypt in order to stand on the communications between England and India, and easily convinced the Directory of the need for France to have a colony on the Red Sea, from where the shortest route could reach India. The Government of the Directory, fearing the popularity of Bonaparte, decided by the way to get rid of his presence in Paris and placed the Italian army and navy at his disposal. The idea of the expedition was associated with the desire of the French bourgeoisie to compete with the English, which was actively asserting its influence in Asia and North Africa ...

Cut off from France, fight local population, which perceived the French as invaders, put the French corps in a stalemate. After the British destroyed the French fleet at the Battle of Aboukir, the surrender of the French corps in Egypt was only a matter of time. Bonaparte, who understood the true state of affairs, tried at first to mask the hopelessness of the situation and the size of the strategic error imposed on France by the brilliance of his victories, but at the first opportunity he left his army, without waiting for the sad outcome. Operations such as the Egyptian Expedition should be classified as adventurous.

Nevertheless, Napoleon's Egyptian expedition led to an increase in interest in the ancient history of Egypt. As a result of the expedition, a huge number of historical monuments were collected and taken to Europe. In 1798, the Institute of Egypt (Institut d "Egypte) was established, which marked the beginning of a large-scale rescue and study of the heritage of ancient Egypt ..."().

This was the official point of view of historians (so to speak, information to fill the vacuum in the heads of ordinary people, who simply are not supposed to know much, in the opinion of those in power).

The unofficial point of view that comes closest to the truth is:

Napoleon Bonaparte was looking for in that Egyptian campaign not fame, not even greater love and respect for himself by the French and the army, as written above, but the source of superpower and superpower itself, which he hoped to find and acquire in the ancient Pyramids of Egypt.

Word "pyramid"- two-root, it is composed of two Greek words "Fire" and "middle", and means "fire in the middle".

Why did Napoleon need to seek superpower?

Think for yourself. Napoleon was already hatching the idea of making the great "Drang nach Osten", a campaign to the Russian East. And was it possible, without gaining superpower, to hope for the subsequent conquest of the Russian Empire, inhabited by numerous descendants of the ancient Aryans-Hyperboreans, who gave the Egyptian pharaohs an idea of the "Holy Spirit", which is the true Creator of the World, and taught the pharaohs to build majestic pyramids in which the action of the "Holy Spirit" acquired special power and produced a magical effect on people entering the center of the pyramid.

(By the way, where did the idea of the "eyes in a pyramid" symbol come from! Not in a triangle, but in a pyramid!)

"Bonaparte before the Sphinx". Jean-Leon Gerome

1899, painting by the artist Maurice Orange. "Napoleon at the Pyramids".

If you, the reader, think that what I have written is something incredible, some kind of conjecture of the author, I humbly note that the initiator of the Second World War of 1939-1945, Adolf Hitler, before treacherously attacking Russia on June 22, 1941, also spent a lot time and effort to search for a source of superpower - a certain Shambhala.

But neither Napoleon nor Hitler were able to find and acquire what they wanted, and the military invasion of Russia ended ingloriously for both aggressors. At the same time, the Egyptian campaign of Napoleon itself and the artifacts obtained by his team helped the autocrats of the Russian Empire open their eyes wide to ancient history, to religion and to the idea of God Almighty, about which all religions of the world speak in different ways.

Judge for yourself: here is the medal "In Memory of the Patriotic War of 1812", issued in 1813-1814. It depicts an ancient Egyptian pyramid with the all-seeing eye of the Most High inside and the "Holy Spirit" emanating from the Most High (from the center of the pyramid). The words engraved on the reverse side of the medal are of particular importance to us: "Not to us, not to us, but to Your name" .

In other words, for the Russian Emperor Alexander I at that time there was no longer a secret that the Pyramids in Egypt are sacred religious structures, capable, like the domes of Christian churches, to concentrate in their focus the special life-giving power of the Creator and exude invisible grace. For this, the pyramids themselves were built by the pharaohs according to the recipe of the Hyperboreans-Aryans, who knew many secrets of the "Holy Spirit" and knew how to use His special power for the good, which is why they received the nickname "noble" - "aryas" in India.

And here is the official information that was published in the supplement to this medal. And in it, I note, not a single word explains why there is such a picture and such an inscription on the medal.

This phenomenon can be explained in one phrase: "What is supposed to know the emperor, who has power from God, no one needs to know!"

As the chronicles testify, on February 5, 1813, a decree was issued on awarding the participants in the liberation of the Russian land from the invasion of Napoleon with the award medal "In Memory of the Patriotic War of 1812", where Emperor Alexander I wrote:

“Warriors! glorious and memorable year, in which in an unheard-of and exemplary manner you struck and punished your daring and powerful enemy, who dared to enter the Fatherland, this glorious year has passed, but your high-profile deeds and deeds of your deeds will not pass and will not cease: you saved the Fatherland with your blood from many peoples and Kingdoms who have mated against him. Through your labors, patience and your wounds, you have gained gratitude from your own and respect from alien Powers. You showed the world with your courage and bravery that where God and faith are in the hearts of the people, at least the enemy forces were similar to the waves of Okiyan, but all of them, like a solid unshakable mountain, will crumble and crumble. Out of all their rage and ferocity, only the groan and noise of death will remain. Warriors! In commemoration of these unforgettable deeds of yours, We commanded to knock out and consecrate a silver medal, which, with the inscription on it of the past, so memorable 1812, should adorn the insurmountable shield of the Fatherland, your chest on a blue ribbon. Each of you is worthy to wear this memorable sign, this testimony of labor, courage and participation in glory; for you all bore the same burden and breathed with unanimous courage. You can be justly proud of this sign. He reveals in you the true sons of the Fatherland blessed by God. Your enemies, seeing him on your bosom, may tremble, knowing that beneath him burns courage, not based on fear or greed, but based on love for faith and the Fatherland and, therefore, invincible by nothing. ". .

Around the same time, new Christian churches began to be rebuilt or built in St. Petersburg, inside and outside of which the same symbol was placed as on the commemorative medal of the war of 1812 - the Egyptian pyramid with the all-seeing eye of the Most High inside and the radiant radiance of the "Holy Spirit" emanating from the Almighty.

The last photo shows the interior of the Kazan Church, built in St. Petersburg. As we can see, in the place where on Egyptian pyramid it was customary to depict the symbolic "all-seeing eye", the priests wrote for all believers literally in plain text (so that it was impossible not to understand) the word - "GOD".

For me personally, this is amazing, because the Orthodox priests of the Russian Empire, thus, with the help of such temple images, openly testified that it was not Jesus Christ who gave the world an idea of the "Holy Spirit"!

By this, the Orthodox priests of the Russian Empire testified that they discovered information about God-Spirit thousands of years before the birth of Christ. Egyptian pharaohs Hyperboreans-Aryans, according to whose project the great pyramids in Giza were built. And only then, after many, many centuries, Jesus Christ, who lived for some time again in Egypt, came to "to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" to reveal to them the secret of the "Holy Spirit" and to reveal His power.

Thanks to Napoleon Bonaparte, who was looking for a source of superpower in Ancient Egypt, and after acquaintance with some secret knowledge Ancient egypt, who directly indicated that the roots of Christianity did not come from ancient Israel, but from Ancient Egypt, the Russian autocrats had a special interest in the idea "God's chosenness" and to the "Holy Spirit", without which, of course, there can be no "God's chosenness".

We can judge about the special interest of the crowned heads of the Russian Empire in this topic by a number of artifacts:

Medal for the capture of Paris on March 19, 1814 by the Russian army under the command of Alexander I. The Russian emperor is depicted literally bathing in the glow of the "Holy Spirit" emanating from the pyramid.

A memorial sign in honor of the coronation of the All-Russian Emperor Nicholas I. The imperial crown is literally bathed in the "Holy Spirit" emanating from the center of the pyramid with an all-seeing eye inside.

Depicted on the last commemorative sign Nicholas I(his life years 1796-1855) and was the founder of the Pulkovo Meridian, which became for half a century for Russian navigators and cartographers literally "the Russian axis of the world".

To this we must add that it was under Nicholas I that it became widely known that Palestine, located near the "Pulkovo meridian", was founded in the distant past by the Proto-Slavic tribes, all the same Hyperboreans-Aryans or their descendants.

A little later, in 1866, after the death of Nicholas I, he mentioned this in his book "About the language of the Jews who lived in ancient time in Russia and about Slavic words found among Jewish writers " Avraam Yakovlevich Garkavi, Russian orientalist and Hebraist, actual state councilor of the Russian Empire.

Compare with the information that is being circulated today: "Christianity originated in the 1st century in Palestine, in the Jewish environment in the context of the messianic movements of Old Testament Judaism". .

So where did Christianity actually begin?

It would be correct to write like this: "Christianity originated in the Jewish environment, in the ancient Slavic land of Palestine, which Jewish writers call Canaan" .

This is actually why Nicholas I believed false history written by the Jews for zombifying the Slavs "Old Testament", and that is why in 1825 he harshly suppressed the attempt of the Judaizing preachers to spread it in the Russian Empire.

And that's why "In 1847, Nicholas I issued an imperial decree on the creation of a Russian Spiritual Mission in Jerusalem. This mission had the right to acquire land and build on the purchased sites.". (A source ).

Why did Nicholas I take this step too?

And to further delineate "Russian axis of the world" dividing the Earth into West and East.

Now I just have to touch on the fact that "Russian axis of the world"("Pulkovo Meridian") also passes through the great city of Constantinople (now Istanbul), which was formerly the capital of the Byzantine Empire. (I will just note: there, too, you need to look for a "Russian trace"!) I will only mention briefly that the city of Constantinople was the capital of the Byzantine Empire in the period from 395 to 1204 and from 1261 to 1453, and in 1054 it became the center of Orthodoxy.

Official information about this city: "During the Middle Ages, Constantinople was the largest and richest city in Europe. Among the names of the city are Byzantium (Greek Βυζάντιον, Latin Byzantium), New Rome (Greek Νέα Ῥώμη, Latin Nova Roma) ( part of the title of patriarch), Constantinople, Constantinople (among the Slavs; translation of the Greek name "Royal City" - Βασιλεύουσα Πόλις - Vasilevus Polis, the city of Vasileus) and Istanbul. The name "Constantinople" (Κωνσταντινούπολη) is preserved in the modern Greek language, "Constantinople" - in the South Slavic ones. In the 9th-12th centuries, the splendid name "Byzantium" (Greek Βυζαντις) was also used. The city was officially renamed Istanbul in 1930 during the reforms of Ataturk ". ().

Now listen from the mouth of the current chapter of "Russian Orthodox Church"important information for us regarding the" Pulkovo Meridian "and the" Russian axis of the world ":

"Hyperborea is everything north of Byzantium!" (C) Patriarch Kirill.

Did you understand well what the head of the Russian Orthodox Church said?

Everything north of Byzantium, whose capital was Constantinople (now Istanbul), through which the Pulkovo Meridian passes, is Hyperborea, which official historians are looking for and cannot find, lamenting where is it? Where?!

How do you, reader, such information about "Russian axis of the world"?!

But about the "Pulkovo Meridian", especially about the fact that "north of Byzantium", you can learn a lot more interesting ...

Forty kilometers north-west of Cusco, in the Sacred Valley of the Incas, is located Ollantaytambo town... The ancient stone buildings are well preserved in it, despite the past centuries (modern science has not been able to date the time of the construction of the object).

The ruins of the town attract historians, lovers of antiquity and, of course, tourists. The construction of this valley is credited with Lemurians, and aliens... And people attribute its destruction global flood... According to the official version, it was built by Pachacuti, and destroyed by the Spaniards.

The most interesting structure of the city "Temple hill" located on the outskirts, there is a wide staircase. The buildings are made of rough, stone blocks.

Besides the temple "Ten Niches", it consists of various stones, and the far wall ends with a step of granaries. Behind is the Platform in an open area, with a carved throne and two unfinished monumental walls.

Centre Temple hill- these are the remains of a huge structure on a rock, it was named - "Temple of the Sun"... This structure, like many others, was destroyed, only the front wall, made of six huge vertically elongated monoliths, has survived. They are about four meters high. Stone inserts are made between the blocks, which close the gaps between them; in the Incas, this technology is not found anywhere else.

City blocks Ollantaytambo fit with amazing accuracy, even a sheet of paper cannot be pushed between them. There are also fountains and several buildings in the center. Many structures are not completed or dismantled for rebuilding, so huge stones are scattered here and there in disarray.

Not far from Temple of Ten Niches located Terraces. They are surrounded by higher walls. The stone blocks of the terraces have point-like projections. They were built like this in case of an attack by the Spaniards. The terraces were used for agricultural purposes and were built from hewn stones, and not from rough ones like the rest of the structures.

The ancient Incas did not foresee the stairs to this structure, apparently getting into it in some other way. Several granaries are located on the hills around. The reserves in them were well preserved due to excellent ventilation. Traces of cut stones are clearly visible on the rocks around; it was from here that the builders took material for the structures. As such there are no quarries in Ollantaytambo... There are slopes around which stones were cut for the construction of the city. You can see how huge the blocks were carved out of the rock.

Who built the city

Ollantaytambo considered a miracle of technology and architecture. How it was built is still unknown. Mankind is not familiar with such construction techniques that have been used.

Painted stones are also of interest, these are several stones in different parts of the city. One gets the impression that they could not be brought to the construction site or were not in time for some reason.

Ollantaytambo shrouded in secrets, imbued with the energy of the ancient Incas and dusty with modernity. For many years, scientists have been arguing about the construction technology and the reason for such large-scale destruction. Many believe that it was impossible in those days to move and install multi-ton megaliths. This means that someone brought or teleported them. Maybe they did it aliens.

WHO BUILT THE CITY ON THE NEVA, CALLED ST. PETERSBURG?

"Emperor Peter I and St. Isaac's Cathedral", St. Petersburg, painting by artist Maxim Vorobyov, 1844

The first person who read this article asked me the question: "What is the practical meaning of this work?"
As an answer to this question, I will quote the words of Pyotr Stolypin (1862-1911), who was killed in Kiev and who held the post of chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Russian Empire in the last years of his life. He said this:
"The people who do not know their history are dung on which other peoples grow."

So in order for us to stop being dung for someone, we need to finally learn our true history and reveal one secret, carefully hidden from century to century, associated with Peter I and the city on the Neva - St. Petersburg.

I will say right away that the first Russian emperor Peter I (1672-1725) did not just appear on the historical stage as a reformer of Russia, and it is not by chance that even during his lifetime, many in Russia talked about replacing one Peter (the son of the second Russian tsar from the Romanov family) with another Peter, foreign, of an unknown family.

By the way, disputes about the tribal origin of "another" Peter I, who went down in Russian history as a great reformer and builder of the city of St. Petersburg, do not subside to this day, because it is really unclear whose blood flowed in his veins. Judging by his lifetime portraits and portraits of his family, Peter I was not unambiguously Russian by blood!

Portraits of the first Russian emperor Peter I, his second wife Catherine I and daughters Elizabeth and Anna:

There are no Russians, Slavs, with such faces as we see in these portraits! Whose blood were Peter I, his second wife Catherine the First and their daughters? - this question remains open to this day.

As for the stormy reform activities of Peter I, today we know only one thing thoroughly: Peter I was literally replaced by another person, or he was "as if changed" (delve into the meanings of the words of the Russian language!) After his stay abroad in the period from March 1697 to August 1698.

Contemporaries noted, who saw and knew Peter I before, that he had changed very much outwardly, but even more, beyond recognition, he had changed internally.
Even before returning to Moscow from a trip abroad, directly from London, the 26-year-old Tsar of All Russia gave a written order to imprison his lawful wife Evdokia Lopukhina, Russian by origin, in the Suzdal Intercession Monastery, whom he married at the age of 16.

Regarding the first wife of Peter I, there is interesting information: "Evdokia Lopukhina went down in history as the last Russian wife of the Russian tsar. And all subsequent Russian emperors also took only foreign women as their wives, which is why there was less and less Russian blood in the veins of their heirs." A source.
A very curious touch in the history of the Russian state, isn't it?
Now let's move on to considering the most interesting cases of Peter and the history of St. Petersburg.

It is known that on July 31, 1698, while staying in Rava (Russian), Peter I met with the King of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth August II. "The communication of the two monarchs, who were almost the same age, lasted for three days. As a result, a personal friendship arose and the creation of an alliance against Sweden was outlined. The final secret agreement with the Saxon elector and the Polish king was concluded on November 1, 1699. According to it, August II was supposed to begin the war against Sweden by the invasion of Livonia. " (Encyclopedic article "The Great Embassy". Source).

Reference: for the first time in the documents Rava-Russkaya was mentioned in the 15th century. Belzian and Mazovian prince Vladislav in 1455 named a small settlement on the Rata river after his Mazovian possession, with the addition of the word "Russian" to distinguish it from Rava Mazovia, now located on the territory of Poland. A source.

On the collage: Leopold I & Peter I (in their youth they looked like brothers) and the coat of arms of the Holy Roman Empire, which later became the coat of arms of the Russian Empire too.
So, returning to Moscow from the foreign embassy, Peter I considered it important for himself to immediately strike a crushing blow on everything Russian, especially Russian history and tradition.

Why and why?
Well, Peter I did not like Russians, that is why he wanted to turn Russia into a semblance of a European state, and most of all - into a semblance of the Holy Roman Empire. In addition, during a foreign tour in Europe, 26-year-old Peter I was explained (most likely Leopold I did it) that he has every chance of turning from “Tsar of All Russia” into “Emperor of the Russian Empire” if he takes a number of correct steps.

Which ones?
Presumably, Peter I was explained this.
By that time, on the coast of the Gulf of Finland, on the territory controlled by the 18-year-old Swedish King Charles XII, there was already a small antique city with stone buildings, partially submerged by the icy waters, the very existence of which did not give rest to the powers that be.

These two-century-old drawings show part of the territory of Vasilievsky Island adjacent to the Bolshaya Neva embankment (Lieutenant Schmidt embankment) between the 25th and 19th lines. Apparently, the draftsman documented not Peter's new buildings, but the remains of an ancient stone city, where, along with the collapsed buildings, there were also relatively intact ones.

Hermitage building.

These "powerful of this world", who are interested in ensuring that all such artifacts never speak, were visited by the 26-year-old Russian Tsar Peter I. on his foreign tour.

It is characteristic that the scale of the destruction of the archers was more global than according to official sources. At that time, the number of archers reached 20 thousand people, and after the suppression of the rifle revolt by the government of Peter I, the Russian army was left without infantry, after which a new set of recruits was made and the army was completely reorganized. A notable fact is that in honor of the suppression of the Streltsy revolt, a commemorative medal was issued with inscriptions in Latin, which had never been used before in minting coins and medals in Russia, but was used in the Holy Roman Empire. "

On the left is the medal of Peter I "Suppression of the Streltsy Riot, 1698", on the right, for comparison, the medal of Leopold I.
A source.

By the way, another interesting detail about the story of the archers' rebellion.
"In March 1698, 175 archers from 4 rifle regiments, who participated in the Azov campaigns of Peter I in 1695-1696, appeared in Moscow urgently summoned by Princess Sofia Alekseevna (sister of Peter I and daughter of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich). I is not her brother ...

On April 4, 1698, the soldiers of the Semyonovsky regiment were sent against the archers, who, with the assistance of the townspeople, "drove" the rebellious archers from the capital. The archers returned to their shelves, where fermentation began.
On June 6, the archers displaced their commanders, elected 4 electives in each regiment and headed towards Moscow. The insurgents (2,200 people) intended to elevate Princess Sophia to the throne or, in case of her refusal, V.V. Golitsyn, who was in exile.

On June 14, after a review on the Khodynka River, the regiments set out from Moscow. On June 17, ahead of the archers, A.I. Repnin occupied the New Jerusalem (Resurrection) monastery. On June 18, 40 versts west of Moscow, the rebels were defeated.
In the battle at the Resurrection Monastery on the part of the Government, the following took part:
Butyrsky regiment - General P. Gordon
"Battalion" of the Preobrazhensky Regiment - Major Nikolai von Salm
"Battalion" (6 companies) of the Semyonovsky regiment - half-colonel I. I. Angler
Lefortovo regiment - Colonel Yu.S. Lim
Artillery under the command of Colonel de Grague (Grange). "Source.

As you can see, the names of the commanders of the government troops are clearly not Russian.
It turns out that a non-Russian head was put on the body of the state-forming Russian people in the form of Peter I and foreigners loyal to him ...

After the suppression of the rebellion of the Streltsy, Peter I considered it important to reform the Russian calendar, which resulted in the fact that the Slavs had 5508 years of their history cut off and the next 7208 summer became the year 1700.
Peter I also replaced the Slavic word "new year" with the "New Year" invented by him ("Happy New Year!"), And the ancient Russian holiday "Christmas of the Sun", celebrated for centuries in Russia on December 25, 3 days after the winter solstice, for the feast of the Nativity of Christ.

That is why this word "Year" was written with a capital letter!
The logic of such a mockery of the consciousness of a Russian person is also curious. The original winter Russian holiday "Christmas of the Sun" (born of the Mother of God-Heaven and the Holy Spirit according to ancient Slavic mythology), celebrated in Russia from time immemorial on December 25, was replaced by the "Christmas of Christ" (born of the Hebrew Virgin Mary and the "Holy Spirit" in the form dove, according to Jewish legend).

The reformer or reformers (perhaps Peter I took this step not alone, but with the "patriarch of all Russia"), were guided by the following considerations: celebrate the holiday "Christmas of the Sun", but on that day it was not yet circumcised according to the Jewish tradition, as befits a Jew! For Jews, circumcision is done on the 8th day from birth. Therefore, by December 25, it is necessary to add 8 more prescribed days, and then the birthday of the God-man Christ turns out exactly - January 1! ".
And after the Petrine reform it became like this:

And so it was (certificate of 1865):

Almost simultaneously with these steps, Peter I, returning from the "Great Embassy", began to prepare for a war with Sweden. It was necessary to fight both for Russia's access to the Baltic Sea, and for the future title of Emperor of the Russian Empire, which Peter I acquired in 1721 after the completion of the 21-year Northern War with Sweden, which began in 1700.

Historical note: "In 1699, the" Northern Alliance "was created against the Swedish king Charles XII, which, in addition to Russia, included Denmark, Saxony and the Commonwealth, headed by the Saxon Elector and the Polish king August II. The driving force of the union was the desire of August II to take away from Sweden Livonia. For help, he promised Russia the return of the lands formerly owned by the Russians (Ingermanlandia, which was located within the boundaries of today's Leningrad region, and Karelia). "

A source.
The latter is an important fact!
In other words, during a long trip abroad, Peter I had an idea (a friend threw in, but which one, August II or Leopold I?) belonged to the Russians.
Modern geographic map showing the border of Russia:

This is how many historians tell about it, including Wikipedia:
“For Russia to enter the war, it was necessary to conclude peace with the Ottoman Empire. After reaching an armistice with the Turkish Sultan for a period of 30 years, Russia on August 19 (30), 1700 declared war on Sweden under the pretext of revenge for the insult shown to Tsar Peter I in Riga ...

The beginning of the war for Peter I was discouraging: the newly recruited army (after the riot of the archers), handed over to the Saxon field marshal Duke de Croa, was defeated near Narva on November 19 (30), 1700.
Considering that Russia was sufficiently weakened, Charles XII left with his troops to Livonia in order to direct all forces against August II.

However, Peter I, continuing the army reforms on the European model, resumed hostilities. Already in the fall of 1702, the Russian army, in the presence of the tsar, captured the Noteburg fortress (renamed Shlisselburg), in the spring of 1703 - the Nyenskans fortress at the mouth of the Neva. Here, on May 16 (27), 1703, the construction of St. Petersburg began, and on the Kotlin Island the base of the Russian fleet was located - the fortress of Kronshlot (later Kronstadt) ". Source.

"On August 18, 1700, Peter received news of the conclusion of the Constantinople Peace Treaty with the Turks and on August 19 (30), not yet knowing about Denmark's withdrawal from the war, he declared war on Sweden, and on August 24 (September 3), Russian troops launched an offensive campaign. According to the treaty of alliance with August II, Russia was to withdraw Ingermanlandia (otherwise "Swedish Ingria") - a territory roughly corresponding to the present Leningrad region.On the border between Ingermanlandia and Estonia was a large city and the largest Swedish fortress in the region - Narva, which became the main target of Russian commanders ...

The siege of Narva was also poorly organized. The shelling of the city from cannons was ineffective due to the fact that the Russian army used too light weapons, moreover, the ammunition was enough for only two weeks. Narva was actually a double fortress together with neighboring Ivangorod, and Peter I, who personally planned the siege, was forced to greatly stretch the Russian troops, surrounding both fortresses at the same time. Such an unfortunate location of the Russian troops subsequently negatively affected their combat effectiveness during the subsequent battle of Narva.

The results of the campaign for the Russian side were disastrous: the losses in killed, mortally wounded, drowned, deserted and died from hunger and frost ranged from 8 thousand to 10 thousand people, 700 people, including 10 generals and 56 officers, were captured, was lost 179 out of 184 guns.

The defeat at Narva played a huge role in the development of the Russian army and the history of the country. As the historian M.N. Pokrovsky pointed out, all Russia's interests in the war were reduced to trade, to conquering an outlet to the sea and gaining control over trade ports in the Baltic. Therefore, from the very beginning of the war, Peter took the Baltic ports of Narva and Riga under special sight, but having suffered a crushing defeat near Narva and being thrown back to the area of present-day St. Petersburg, he decided to build a new port and city at the mouth of the Neva - the future capital of the Russian Empire. " A source.

So, not knowing how to fight properly, having at that time only a 40 thousandth army, (and what is 40 thousand people for the king of all Russia?), Unable even to recapture Ivangorod from the Swedes, founded in the spring of 1492 by the Moscow prince Ivan III Once in order for Russia to have its own seaport in the Baltic, Peter I eagerly proceeds to lay down a new city from scratch and after 8 years declares it the capital of Russia!

Don't you think this is at least strange?
Do not you think that in this intention of Peter the Great to build a new capital of Russia on the shores of the Gulf of Finland there is a certain "second bottom", "a certain secret", which the official history is silent about ...

The plan of the new city of St. Petersburg, drawn up in 1717 in Paris.
What's the secret?

Let's say that Peter I wanted Russia to have access to the Baltic Sea, and therefore he deposed the status of the capital from Moscow and entrusted this status to the newly built city.

Agree, somehow frivolous. Well, it would be just a port city, like Ivangorod, why did the capital have to be moved ?!

There is only one explanation for this phenomenon: the "powerful of this world", whom the Russian tsar visited during his foreign tour, or who (according to another version) replaced the son of Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov - Peter I - with their own man, inspired him that he could one day become a great emperor, like the mighty emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, but for this you need to do one little thing connected with the "northern capital of Russia": everyone must believe that the "king of all Russia" built a new stone city with a complex architecture practically from scratch!

Panorama of the city, made up of photographs taken in 1861. Clickable !!!

As a result, through the efforts of Peter I, and his followers of emperors and empresses, and Western historians who served them and wrote for us the history of the Russian State, RUSSIAN HISTORY WAS DISTORTED AND IZOLGAN, as the first Russian academician Mikhailo Lomonosov later wrote and said, for which almost paid with his life.
Article: "For what was the outstanding Russian scientist Mikhailo Lomonosov sentenced to death?"
Well, Peter I, for his great zeal, received the title of "Emperor of All Russia" in 1721, as the engraving of the court artist Fyodor Zubov eloquently testifies to us:

The coat of arms of the Holy Roman Empire and its ruler Leopold I.
The opinion of an independent historian and just a very observant person, Andrei Kadykchansky:
"Peter. For me, it is mysterious not so much by its appearance as by its inexplicable oblivion. It is quite obvious that it is the same antediluvian, antique city, like all those cities that Europe attributes to the achievements of their own ancestors.

It is incomprehensible how it was possible to convince the whole world that the whole Mediterranean is antiquity, the cradle of world civilization, and Petersburg is only some three hundred years old?
Historians argue that Peter I thus introduced "wild, dark, uneducated, downtrodden" Russia to the achievements of the "great Western civilization." But we now know that the Russians did not always sigh with awe at the Snickers and Marlboros. This model of behavior was introduced into the mass consciousness during the years of Khrushchev's wrecking rule, aggravated during the times of Brezhnev's decomposition caused by a well-fed, carefree life, which took especially ugly caricatured forms under Gorbachev, and reached its peak during the shameful period of "reign", the eternally drunk EBN.

It never occurred to us that someone could muster up such impudence that they would ascribe such global achievements as ancient architecture and sculpture to themselves. Because it is by nature absolutely unnatural for us ourselves. We readily believe in the brilliant achievements of Western civilization, whose representatives only grit their teeth because St. Petersburg is not on their territory.

Anton Blagin:
Now let's remember the "Masonic symbols" of St. Petersburg, which are very common in the architecture of buildings.

Do you see a triangle with rays emanating from it?
Do you think this is really a "Masonic symbol"?

The most amazing thing in our history is that someone had to create and officially register a Masonic lodge called "Freemasons" (so that everyone knows there are such guys!) Only because the city on the Neva is St. Petersburg with its amazingly rich architecture appeared on all maps of the world!

Historical note: "The modern Order of Freemasons was organizationally formed at the beginning of the 18th century. On the day of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist, June 24, 1717, the first in the world" Great Lodge "was established in the London tavern" Goose and Spit ", which united four" Small Lodges " , gathered before that time in other city taverns, thus creating a Masonic organization of the new era, which laid the foundation for the institution of modern Freemasonry, which spread a couple of decades later throughout the European continent.

Well, who else, besides these mysterious "free masons", could possess the amazing secrets of artistic stone processing and create such beauty ?! This question is, of course, sarcasm on my part.
Here is an example of the strikingly beautiful stone processing used during the construction of St. Petersburg:

The figures are stone, but the impression is that they are cast in the same mold! And they seem to be actually cast! This technology (or something like this) is used to make stone sinks for kitchens!
IMPORTANT VIDEO APP:
"Pre-Petrine Peter":

Comments:

Anton Blagin: I will now cite two old drawings made by court artists who were supposed to use painting (alas, there was no cinematograph yet!) To convince everyone who showed interest in the technique and technology of building the city of Peter that the granite columns of St. Isaac's Cathedral, flawlessly round diameter and careful grinding, made in the local quarry bast shoes men with the help of simple iron axes!

"Quarry Puterlax near Vyborg, property of landowner von Exparre".

It is on such a lie, focused on people who do not know how to think, that our would-be historians are pierced! They would be silent - the people would simply be at a loss in conjectures! And now, after such a lie, that's it, pipes! It is already clear that the "Cathedral of Isa-Kievsky" was built in a completely different way and by the wrong people! And at a completely different time!

So who built St. Petersburg? And what do the Masons have to do with it, despite the fact that the city on the Neva is literally stuffed with mysterious symbols, which many consider Masonic?

Not so long ago, maybe a month ago, I published an article "The Russian Axis of the World".
Below I want to cite it in full, because it is just a continuation of this topic, just written a little earlier.
"RUSSIAN AXIS OF THE WORLD"

Do you know, reader, what is this red line running across the globe of the Earth?

And unofficially (and this information is not widely promoted), this red line on the world map shows how the most mysterious people on earth moved from north to south several millennia ago (or maybe several tens of millennia!), Whose representatives the ancient Greeks called Hyperboreans ("those who lived beyond Boreus"), and the Hindus called them Aryans, Aryans, which is translated into Russian as "noble".

Peter I, apparently, introduced an imitation of the once existing Hyperborean classification of initiates into the secrets of fire, stone and spirit! They were called aryas - noble ones.

When in Russia and the world at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries there was a boom in the Aryan theme and Aryan symbolism (the main Aryan symbol is the well-known swastika sign - a cross with curled ends, and another symbol is an "eye in a triangle"), the French philosopher and writer Edward Schure wrote the following lines in his book about the Aryans: “If the black race matured under the scorching sun of Africa, the flourishing of the white race took place under the icy breeze of the North Pole. Greek mythology calls whites Hyperboreans. These red-haired, blue-eyed people walked from the north through the forests, illuminated by the northern lights, accompanied by dogs and deer, led by brave leaders, urged by the clairvoyance of their women.

The gold of the hair and the blue of the eyes are predetermined colors. This race was assigned to create a solar cult of sacred fire and bring into the world a longing for the heavenly Motherland ... "(E. Shure." The Great Initiates ", Printing House of the Provincial Zemsky Council, 1914).
Another writer, B.G. Tilak, who is of Indo-Aryan origin (he is from a Brahman family), at about the same time wrote and published the book "The Arctic Homeland in the Vedas".

In the modern edition of the book by B. G. Tilak, in the annotation to it, literally the following is written: The Vedas and the Avesta that the ancestral home of the Aryans existed in the Arctic region, and the last glaciation drove the Aryan races from the north to the lands of Europe.The Indian scientist saw in the ancient texts an accurate reflection of not only historical, astronomical, but also geophysical realities associated with the Arctic. Tilaku will be decades ahead of the conclusions of archaeologists, philologists, physicists and astronomers and contribute to the general progress of knowledge about the original history of the human race and the history of the planet inhabited by this race. " (A source).

Encyclopedic information: "The Pulkovo meridian, passing through the center of the main building of the observatory and located 30 ° 19.6" east of Greenwich, was previously the reference point for all geographical maps of Russia. All ships of Russia counted their longitude from the Pulkovo meridian, until in 1884 the meridian passing through the axis of the transit instrument of the Greenwich Observatory (the zero or Greenwich meridian) was taken as the zero-point for longitudes throughout the globe. "Source.

In other words, today (and for 132 years now) the Pulkovo meridian is located at 30 ° 19.6 "east longitude. And earlier, for almost 50 years, the Pulkovo meridian was at zero degrees of geographic longitudes. and served for all Russian navigators and cartographers literally "the Russian axis of the world" until the initiative was intercepted by the "mistress of the seas" power-hungry England.
Now it's time to ask questions:

Was it by chance in 1827 that the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences (with the approval of Tsar Nicholas I) decided to create a new, Pulkovo observatory?
Was it by chance that the Pulkovo Observatory and the city of St. Petersburg itself were on the same line with such sacred cities as Kiev, Constantinople (now Istanbul) and Alexandria?

According to the same encyclopedia, “The appointed special commission stopped the selection at the top of the Pulkovo mountain, indicated by Emperor Nicholas I and lying to the south of the capital, 14 versts from the Moscow outpost, at an altitude of 248 feet (75 meters) above sea level. A committee of academicians Vishnevsky, Parrot, Struve and Fuss was formed in 1833 under the chairmanship of Admiral A. Greig, who had already erected an observatory in Nikolaev several years earlier. Bryullov, and the instruments were simultaneously ordered in Munich to Ertel, Reichenbach and Merz and Mahler, in Hamburg - to the Repsold brothers. buildings reached 2,100,500 rubles in banknotes, including 40,000 rubles in banknotes issued to state peasants who had their own estates on a plot of 20 acres alienated for the observatory. Originally, an observatory building with three towers and 2 houses for astronomers was built ... "

A source.
After these words, it is reasonable to be puzzled by two questions: "why did the Russian emperor Nicholas I indicate the place to Russian scientists, and not vice versa, did they show him the place where a new observatory should be built? And why did Nicholas I choose the place indicated by him, and not what something else? "

The answer to both these questions can be the following ancient map, compiled more than two thousand years ago by Hipparchus, on which the division of the Earth into West and East passed through the ancient Egyptian "academic town" - Alexandria, which for a long time was famous for its richest scientific library.

Here is a map of the world compiled by Hipparchus in about 150 BC. The axis of the world on this map is the Alexandria meridian.

The Russian Emperor Nicholas I, being a highly educated and initiated person into some secrets, of course knew that St. Petersburg was located exactly on the line of the Alexandria meridian. In addition, he knew that on this line is the largest shrine of Egypt - the great pyramid of Cheops.

It is precisely for these reasons that the Russian Emperor Nicholas I pointed out to Russian scientists where a new Russian observatory should be built. The Russian emperor thus decided to fix for descendants a direct historical connection between St. Petersburg, Alexandria and the ancient Egyptian pyramids.

And now, to clarify the above, I'll tell you a little about something that no one else has written about.

Let's ask ourselves a question: why did Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France, before attacking the Russian Empire in 1812, decided to make a difficult and very risky military campaign in Egypt?

The calm that came after the brilliant successes of the Italian campaign of 1796-1797 did not correspond to the political plans of General Bonaparte. After the first victories, Napoleon began to claim an independent role. He needed a series of victorious events that would boggle the imagination of the nation and make him the favorite hero of the army. He worked out a plan for an expedition to occupy Egypt in order to stand on the communications between England and India, and easily convinced the Directory of the need for France to have a colony on the Red Sea, from where the shortest route could reach India. The Government of the Directory, fearing the popularity of Bonaparte, decided by the way to get rid of his presence in Paris and placed the Italian army and navy at his disposal. The idea of the expedition was associated with the desire of the French bourgeoisie to compete with the English, which was actively asserting its influence in Asia and North Africa ...

The isolation from France, the struggle of the local population, which perceived the French as invaders, put the French corps in a stalemate. After the British destroyed the French fleet at the Battle of Aboukir, the surrender of the French corps in Egypt was only a matter of time. Bonaparte, who understood the true state of affairs, tried at first to mask the hopelessness of the situation and the size of the strategic error imposed on France by the brilliance of his victories, but at the first opportunity he left his army, without waiting for the sad outcome. Operations such as the Egyptian Expedition should be classified as adventurous.

Nevertheless, Napoleon's Egyptian expedition led to an increase in interest in the ancient history of Egypt. As a result of the expedition, a huge number of historical monuments were collected and taken to Europe. In 1798, the Institute of Egypt (Institut d "Egypte) was created, which marked the beginning of a large-scale rescue and study of the heritage of ancient Egypt ..." (Source).

The word "pyramid" has two roots, it is composed of two Greek words "fire" and "middle", and means "fire in the middle".
Why did Napoleon need to seek superpower?

"Bonaparte before the Sphinx". Jean-Leon Gerome

1899, painting by the artist Maurice Orange. "Napoleon at the Pyramids".
If you, the reader, think that what I have written is something incredible, some kind of conjecture of the author, I humbly note that the initiator of the Second World War of 1939-1945, Adolf Hitler, before treacherously attacking Russia on June 22, 1941, also spent a lot time and effort to search for a source of superpower - a certain Shambhala.

Judge for yourself: here is the medal "In Memory of the Patriotic War of 1812", issued in 1813-1814. It depicts an ancient Egyptian pyramid with the all-seeing eye of the Most High inside and the "Holy Spirit" emanating from the Most High (from the center of the pyramid). The words engraved on the reverse side of the medal are of particular importance for us: "Not for us, not for us, but for Your name."

This phenomenon can be explained in one phrase: "Nobody needs to know what the emperor, who has power from God, is supposed to know!"
As the chronicles testify, on February 5, 1813, a decree was issued on awarding the participants in the liberation of the Russian land from the invasion of Napoleon with the award medal "In Memory of the Patriotic War of 1812", where Emperor Alexander I wrote:
“Warriors! glorious and memorable year, in which in an unheard-of and exemplary manner you struck and punished your daring and powerful enemy, who dared to enter the Fatherland, this glorious year has passed, but your high-profile deeds and deeds of your deeds will not pass and will not cease: you saved the Fatherland with your blood from many peoples and Kingdoms who have mated against him. Through your labors, patience and your wounds, you have gained gratitude from your own and respect from alien Powers. You showed the world with your courage and bravery that where God and faith are in the hearts of the people, at least the enemy forces were similar to the waves of Okiyan, but all of them, like a solid unshakable mountain, will crumble and crumble. Out of all their rage and ferocity, only the groan and noise of death will remain. Warriors! In commemoration of these unforgettable deeds of yours, We commanded to knock out and consecrate a silver medal, which, with the inscription on it of the past, so memorable 1812, should adorn the insurmountable shield of the Fatherland, your chest on a blue ribbon. Each of you is worthy to wear this memorable sign, this testimony of labor, courage and participation in glory; for you all bore the same burden and breathed with unanimous courage. You can be justly proud of this sign. He reveals in you the true sons of the Fatherland blessed by God. Your enemies, seeing him on your bosom, may tremble, knowing that beneath him flames courage, not based on fear or greed, but based on love for faith and the Fatherland and, therefore, invincible. "

A source.
Around the same time, new Christian churches began to be rebuilt or built in St. Petersburg, inside and outside of which the same symbol was placed as was on the commemorative medal of the war of 1812 - the Egyptian pyramid with the all-seeing eye of the Most High inside and the radiant radiance of the "Holy Spirit" emanating from the Almighty.

The last photo shows the interior of the Kazan Church, built in St. Petersburg. As we can see, in the place where it was customary to depict the symbolic "all-seeing eye" on the Egyptian pyramid, the priests wrote for all believers literally in plain text (so that it was impossible not to understand) the word "GOD".

By this, the Orthodox priests of the Russian Empire testified that the information about God the Spirit thousands of years before the birth of Christ was revealed to the Egyptian pharaohs by the Hyperboreans-Aryans, according to whose design the great pyramids in Giza were built. And only then, after many, many centuries, Jesus Christ, who lived for some time again in Egypt, came to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel" to reveal to them the secret of the "Holy Spirit" and to reveal His power.

Thanks to Napoleon Bonaparte, who was looking for a source of superpower in Ancient Egypt, and after getting acquainted with some secret knowledge of Ancient Egypt, which directly indicated that the roots of Christianity did not go from ancient Israel, but from Ancient Egypt, the Russian autocrats developed a special interest in the idea of "God's chosenness" and to the "Holy Spirit", without which, of course, there can be no "God's chosenness".
We can judge about the special interest of the crowned heads of the Russian Empire in this topic by a number of artifacts:

Nicholas I, depicted on the last memorial sign (his years of life are 1796-1855), was the founder of the Pulkovo Meridian, which became literally the Russian axis of the world for half a century for Russian navigators and cartographers.

A little later, in 1866, after the death of Nicholas I, Abraham Yakovlevich Garkavi, Russian orientalist and Hebraist, real State Counselor of the Russian Empire.

Compare with the information that is spreading today: "Christianity originated in the 1st century in Palestine, in the Jewish environment in the context of the messianic movements of Old Testament Judaism." A source.

So where did Christianity actually begin?
It would be correct to write this: "Christianity originated in the Jewish environment, in the ancient Slavic land of Palestine, which Jewish writers call Canaan."

That is why Nicholas I considered the "Old Testament" written by the Jews to zombify the Slavs as a false story, and that is why in 1825 he harshly suppressed the attempt of Jewish preachers to spread it in the Russian Empire.

And that is why "in 1847, Nicholas I issued an imperial decree on the creation of a Russian Ecclesiastical Mission in Jerusalem. This mission had the right to acquire land plots and build on the purchased plots." (A source).
Why did Nicholas I take this step too?

And to even more strongly designate the "Russian axis of the world" dividing the Earth into West and East.

Now I am simply obliged to touch upon the fact that the "Russian axis of the world" ("Pulkovo meridian") also passes through the great city of Constantinople (now Istanbul), which was formerly the capital of the Byzantine Empire. (I will just note: there, too, you need to look for a "Russian trace"!) I will only mention briefly that the city of Constantinople was the capital of the Byzantine Empire in the period from 395 to 1204 and from 1261 to 1453, and in 1054 it became the center of Orthodoxy.

Official information about this city: "During the Middle Ages, Constantinople was the largest and richest city in Europe. Among the names of the city - Byzantium (Greek ;;;;;;;;;, Latin Byzantium), New Rome (Greek; ;; ;;;;, lat. Nova Roma) (included in the title of patriarch), Constantinople, Constantinople (among the Slavs; translation of the Greek name "Royal City" - ;;;;;;;;;;; ;;;; ; - Vasilevus Polis, the city of Vasileus) and Istanbul. The name "Constantinople" (;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;) is preserved in the modern Greek language, "Constantinople" - in the South Slavic. In IX-XII the splendid name "Byzantida" (Greek ;;;;;;;;) was also used for centuries. The city was officially renamed Istanbul in 1930 during the reforms of Ataturk. " (A source).

Now listen to the important information for us regarding the Pulkovo Meridian and the Russian axis of the world from the mouth of the current head of the Russian Orthodox Church:
"Hyperborea is everything north of Byzantium!" (C) Patriarch Kirill.

Did you understand well what the head of the Russian Orthodox Church said?
Everything north of Byzantium, whose capital was Constantinople (now Istanbul), through which the Pulkovo Meridian passes, is Hyperborea, which official historians are looking for and cannot find, lamenting where is it? Where?!

How do you, reader, have this information about the "Russian axis of the world" ?!
But about the "Pulkovo Meridian", especially about the fact that "north of Byzantium", you can learn a lot more interesting ...
July 31, 2016, Murmansk. Anton Blagin
P.S.
"Help to the author" with a note: for the book "Between Good and Evil".